Lol: Elon Musk may have accidentally leaked his burner account:- On Monday night, Elon Musk tweeted a photo that showed him logged into his Twitter account and promoting monetization features for content creators on the platform. However, some users noticed that he appeared to be logged into another account, which was later identified as @ErmnMusk.
This account had been deleted but was believed to be Musk’s “burner account” as it used a photo of his three-year-old son as its avatar and had the display name “Elon Test.”
While it’s uncertain if this was truly Musk’s burner account, there are some pieces of evidence that make this theory plausible. For example, the account was created around the same time Musk was testing out a new social media app called “Jabberwocky.” Additionally, the account had been active for several months before it was deleted, suggesting it was being used for a specific purpose.
Despite the attention surrounding Musk’s potential burner account, some users were more interested in the fact that he had 24.7K paid subscribers. This is a feature that Twitter recently launched, allowing users to charge for exclusive content.
As one of the most followed users on the platform, Musk’s use of this feature could have a significant impact on the way content creators monetize their work on Twitter.
Overall, while it’s uncertain whether @ErmnMusk was truly Musk’s burner account, the speculation around it highlights the intrigue and curiosity that surrounds one of the world’s most prominent and enigmatic tech billionaires.
he article discusses the potential existence of a burner account belonging to Elon Musk, named @ErmnMusk, which had been deleted after being active for several months. While some tweets on the account were mundane, others were considered uncomfortable.
For instance, when Bitcoin promoter Michael Saylor tweeted about Satoshi, the creator of Bitcoin, @ErmnMusk replied with a seemingly unrelated question about liking Japanese girls.
In another tweet, @ErmnMusk responded to a user who made fun of former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, who pled guilty to billions of dollars in wire fraud amid the FTX collapse.
The tweet implied that FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried risked his billionaire status for sex, and @ErmnMusk replied with a seemingly unrelated statement about loving librarians.
Furthermore, some tweets on the account appeared to be from Musk’s two-year-old son, X Æ A-XII, whom he refers to as X. The article suggests that while it’s uncertain whether the account was truly Musk’s burner account, the evidence suggests that it may have been. The article also highlights the curiosity surrounding the world’s most prominent and enigmatic tech billionaires and their social media presence.
While the tweets on the potential burner account may seem trivial and even amusing, they raise questions about the ethics of using burner accounts and the potential consequences of being caught. The use of burner accounts to express opinions or sentiments that one may not want to associate with their public persona can be seen as deceitful and manipulative, particularly when it involves high-profile individuals who have a significant impact on public discourse.
It’s important to consider the potential implications of social media use and to ensure that our online behavior aligns with our values and ethics.
The article discusses the possibility that a now-deleted Twitter account with the handle @ErmnMusk, which appeared to have been created as a burner account by Elon Musk, had been leaked by the tech billionaire himself.
While some of the tweets on the account seemed mundane, others were considered uncomfortable, including crude comments about women and roleplaying as Musk’s two-year-old son, X Æ A-XII.
While it’s uncertain whether the account was truly Musk’s burner account, there’s evidence that suggests it may have been. The account was created soon after Musk purchased Twitter, and the image of X, Musk’s son, uploaded on November 29, 2022, didn’t seem to have appeared anywhere else online before this.
Additionally, the account used the name “Elon Test” for most of its existence, except for when it used the name “Star Sapphire.”
While the possibility of a tech billionaire using a burner account to express opinions or sentiments that they may not want to associate with their public persona may seem harmless, it raises questions about the ethics of such behavior.
The use of burner accounts to deceive and manipulate can undermine trust in public discourse and erode the credibility of high-profile individuals. Furthermore, the potential for such behavior to be exposed, as in this case, can lead to reputational damage and a loss of public trust.
The article also highlights the potential consequences of social media use, particularly for those in the public eye. It’s crucial to consider the impact of our online behavior and to ensure that our actions align with our values and ethics.
As individuals, we have a responsibility to use social media responsibly and to promote a healthy online culture. As for Musk and other high-profile individuals, they should be aware of the potential risks of using burner accounts and the impact that their actions can have on public discourse and trust.
- Just in: Elon Musk’s Starship grounded by US govt for raining metal debris
- Just in: ‘It is lawsuit time’, Elon Musk threatens to sue Microsoft – here’s why
- Just in: Elon Musk Responds to Calls to Hire Ex-Fox News Star Tucker Carlson
- Elon Musk appeared to change the way customers pay for Twitter Blue in Europe, Take a look